⚖️ What legal teams should know about AI and unclaimed property risk

Healthy skepticism about AI is warranted.

It’s oversold.
It’s often poorly governed.
And in legal, it can create more risk than it removes when misunderstood.

Unclaimed property is a good example.

AI doesn’t change the law.
It doesn’t eliminate exposure.
And it doesn’t replace legal judgment.

What changes is when legal teams must engage.

Historically, unclaimed property risk reaches legal when:
• An audit starts 📩
• A regulator estimates exposure 📊
• Positions are already entrenched ⚖️

At that point, leverage is gone.

Used carefully — and governed tightly — AI can surface patterns and anomalies early, while numbers are still explainable and assumptions are still optional.

This isn’t about trusting AI.
It’s about not letting regulators be the first ones to quantify your risk.

Legal teams may need “AI tools.”
However, they need early and defensible visibility — on their terms.

Unclaimed property has always been a timing problem.
AI just moves the clock ⏱️

If AI isn’t the right tool here, when should legal first quantify unclaimed property risk — after an audit starts, or before anyone is asking?

linkedin.com/in/moyerosibodu

#GeneralCounsel #LegalRisk #UnclaimedProperty #Compliance #LegalTech #AIinLaw #EscheatAnalyzer #UnclaimedPropertyAnalyzer